Living Shoreline to Irene: Is That All You Got?!
Chesapeake Lobbying War Over Exemption for Agriculture. Ag Out-Spends Clean Water Advocates on Lobbying 3 X 1

Ag Industry Slam of 'Bad Science' is Bad Science

Cows in creek 012 Should we delay Bay cleanup because of agriculture industry allegations of bad science?  Absolutely not, because the industry’s claims are themselves bad science.

An independent panel of scientific experts has concluded, in a report released this morning, that an agricultural industry study that sought to delay EPA’s Chesapeake Bay pollution “diet” is of “poor scientific merit” and full of errors.

“It was an effort to mislead the public, the farm community, and Congress, using flawed science,"  CBF Senior Water Quality Scientist Dr. Beth McGee said. "The (agriculture industry) report was but one part of a coordinated attempt by national agribusiness lobbying groups to block implementation the Chesapeake Bay pollution diet and to delay efforts to clean up the region’s rivers, streams, and the Chesapeake Bay.”

The Bay pollution “diet” is a set of pollution limits for the Chesapeake Bay, also called the Bay Total Maximum Daily Load or TMDL, that seeks to reduce the total amount of nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment in the Bay by about 25 percent by 2025.

Last July, an agricultural trade organization called the Agricultural Nutrient Policy Council released a report by a firm it had hired called LimnoTech.  The LimnoTech report argued that Bay pollution “diet” should be delayed because of allegedly serious discrepancies in scientific modeling used to develop the limits.  

“It is clear to us that the EPA’s TMDL water regulations are based on flawed information," American Farm Bureau Federation President Bob Stallman said in July 2011 press release.

This morning, an independent panel of scientists convened by the Chesapeake Bay Program’s Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee (STAC) released an analysis of the Limnotech report that found:  “The LimnoTech analyses have poor scientific merit and promote a false set of criteria by which to judge the suitability of the Chesapeake Bay Program watershed model for use in the TMDL implementation process.”

The scientific committee found that the LimnoTech report had significant “errors” and “does not provide sufficient evidence to suspend implementation of the Bay TMDL.”

To read the whole STAC report, click here

What do you think about this?

By Tom Pelton

Chesapeake Bay Foundation 

(Photos of cows in north central Pennsylvania's Wyalusing Creek by Tom Pelton)


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)