« Video Investigation of Gas Drilling Sites Reveals Invisible Air Pollution | Main | Chesapeake News and Events »

12/01/2011

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Excellent article! good videos. Thanks for sharing this!

Great article, i really like it.

Interesting debate. Great site.

Opa, opa, opa Dr. Osmar Essa sua listagem este1 ecqivouada. 14 jogos do Corinthians aed em Se3o Paulo, porque aqui no Rio, do Corinthians ne3o passa nem jogo de totf3. Da mesma forma aed em SP com os jogos do Fla. Pode ter certeza que aqui no Rio seremos soberanos como sempre.Ah, e pode tirar o cavalinho da chuva se acha que o Flamengo vai fechar com a Globo pelo mesmo valor do Corinthians. O Flamengo fechare1 por uns 10 milhf5es a mais e isso je1 este1 acertado.Se o senhor quiser a gente faz uma aposta: Se o Fla fechar com um valor igual ou inferior ao do Corinthians, eu posto aqui no seu blog que sou Corinthiano apaixonado, mas se o valor for maior que o do Corinthinas o senhor faz um post dizendo que embora corinthiano, ama o Fla. Fechado?

Good bye, considerate soul mate :)

I must say that I don't understand the presime that the Pirates should be looking to 2011. Matt identifies 4 MLB-quality players that we can expect (hope) to see in the field (we have 5 now 6 if you think Freddy's 2008 is a fluke). As we know, there are effectively no MLB-quality arms in the pipeline (Tony Watson, I guess; maybe a couple other guys in A-ball, but why should we assume any of them will turn out better than Gorzo, JVB, or Bullington?).In other words, there is no concrete reason to expect this team to get better, rather than worse, in the future. Now, of course, if someone wants to give us real prospects for Bay/Nady/Marte/Wilson, that's worth looking at. But even fantasy trades say, Jurrjens for Wilson don't necessarily make this team better (Wilson's absence cost as many games as Jurrjens' presence would have gained us after all, coming out of Florida, Jair replaces Morris and Dumatrait, not Gorzo and Snell).What I hear when I read break up the Bucs is maybe every trade will gain us 2 MLB-quality players for 1. We all know that doesn't happen. Get rid of every veteran we have, and we'd be lucky to get back to even on them, talent-wise. In the short term, we're looking at 100 loss seasons, and in the long term, we're right back where we are a team a couple front-line starters away from contention.

I'm not terribly coinvncd that Bay will age well. When you have a bad season in your prime because of knee injuries it doesn't speak well of your ability to continue to perform when your knees naturally get worse.The point about Bay having lots of different skills and thus a likelihood of aging well is a good one. Usually players like that do age better. I'm not sure he's that player any longer, though. I don't give him a plus for his speed anymore, he has 6 SB this year, he had 4 last year and 11 the year before that. There was only season one season of 20 steals. As for average, he's usually around 280, which isn't particularly high. He's a bad fielder at this point in his career. He can still hit for power and gets on base, those are positive signs. But I wouldn't go so far as saying he's got a ton of different skills at this point.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Voted 'best news blog' by readers of The Baltimore Sun in the 2010 Maryland's Outstanding Blog (or Mobbies) awards.

The Bay Daily Bloggers

Tom Pelton and Chuck Epes

DISCLAIMER

  • PLEASE READ OUR TERMS OF USE
    The views and opinions expressed in the media, articles or comments on this site are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions held by CBF and the inclusion of such information does not imply endorsement by CBF. CBF is not responsible for the contents of any linked Web, or any link contained in a linked Web site, or any changes or updates to such Web sites. The inclusion of any link or comment is provided only for information purposes. CBF reserves the right to edit or remove any comments and material posted to this website and to ban users from the site without notice. Partisan, pornographic or other inappropriate content, product or service promotion, foul language or bad behavior is expressly forbidden and will be removed.

SUBSCRIBE TO THIS BLOG

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter
    Blog powered by TypePad