March 30 was the deadline for the six Bay states to deliver updated, state-specific Bay cleanup plans to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The plans, called Phase 2 Watershed Implementation Plans, or WIPs, are to serve as the state blueprints for restoring the Bay by 2025.
They’re a pretty big deal.
The plans are the third or fourth iteration of the WIPs. More general plans were initially drafted and given to EPA in fall of 2010, then revised and strengthened after a public comment period (and much public criticism) late in 2010.
First drafts of the Phase 2 plans debuted in December. Virginia’s plan and those of Maryland and Pennsylvania lacked much of the expected local data, however, and the Chesapeake Bay Foundation (CBF), among others, called on the states to beef up their plans with many more local details, especially the goals and strategies for reducing pollution from farms and urban areas. After all, how can CBF, EPA, or Bay region citizens know whether the states are serious about restoring the Bay if they don’t tell you more precisely how they intend to do it and commit to specific actions?
It’s a bit too soon to know whether the plans will deliver on the necessary details. Stay tuned for more on the state WIPs in the coming days. To see Virginia's plan, click here.
In another development last week, the Virginia Soil and Water Conservation Board began asking for public comment on proposed regulations designed to provide Virginia farmers with “safe harbor” from future Chesapeake Bay cleanup requirements. Farmers have complained about the uncertainty of not knowing what future Bay cleanup rules and regulations may require of agriculture. They say they just want to know what’s expected of them regarding Bay restoration, then be left alone to do it.
Virginia’s Resource Management Plan (RMP) regulations aim to provide that certainty by specifying what practices farmers must employ to be in compliance with the Bay pollution limits and thus “safe harbored” from future requirements. CBF supports this safe harbor concept but has asked the state board to work with EPA to determine the pollution impact of the proposed program and answer a fundamental question: Will it, in fact, achieve the Bay cleanup goals for agriculture? Without that knowledge, CBF is left to wonder whether 2025 will arrive, Virginia will have missed its cleanup goal, and the Bay will not be restored.
To see Virginia's proposed RMP regulations, click here.
And finally, Bay Daily would like to note the recent passing of Louise Burke, a transplanted Californian who moved to Richmond, Va., with her husband in 1956 and immediately fell in love with the city’s James River and surrounding landscapes. Long before many in the Richmond area grasped the importance of green space, Mrs. Burke was quietly working in the conservation trenches.
Thanks largely to her efforts over the years, Richmond now enjoys one of the nation’s finest urban parks, the James River Park system. And that’s just one of many conservation victories won by this foresighted and persistent gentlewoman.
For an inspiring tribute to what one person can do to make a difference for an entire community, read Louise Burke’s obituary in the Richmond Times-Dispatch.
Happy Spring!
Chuck Epes
Chesapeake Bay Foundation
Photo of Mrs. Burke by Richmond Times-Dispatch

It feels great to see efforts like these in showing concern to the environment. This is something which should be replicated in our country. Here, our rivers and bays are starting to get polluted without the government looking at how it adversely affected the economic chain.
As with the farmers there in the US, restrictions have also been introduced (though not in the form of legislation) but after the heat of the "implementation push" subsided, we were only the ones left to carry the burden.
Posted by: De Oro Farmers | 07/20/2012 at 02:37 AM
I feel pretty good, and support you.
Posted by: thomas sabo | 01/21/2013 at 12:35 AM
Marque Pull AAA
Marque T Shirt Longue
Marque Chaussure
Nike Free Run
Marque Chaussure
http://www.b44.fr/vetement-homme-marque-pull-aaa-c-13_1185.html
http://www.b44.fr/vetement-homme-marque-chemise-longue-c-13_1067.html
http://www.9fr.fr/vetement-homme-marque-veste-cuir-c-5_861.html
http://www.laredoutecode.fr/vetement-femme-marque-col-polo-c-16_867.html
http://www.9fr.fr/sac-marque-portefeuille-c-7_286.html
Chaussure Homme
Sac
Vetement Femme
Chaussure Femme
Vetement Homme
http://www.spartooo.fr/chaussure-femme-c-2.html
http://e77.fr/autres-c-70.html
http://www.7fr.fr
http://e66.fr/vetement-femme-c-47.html
http://e66.fr/vetement-homme-c-41.html
Posted by: peivnyjn | 04/29/2013 at 09:39 PM
Marque Tee Shirt
Maillot Foot Club 2012
Marque Bijoux Collier
Nike Dunk AF1 Blazer
Maillot Manches Longues
http://www.laredoutecode.fr/vetement-homme-marque-gilet-hiver-c-13_1124.html
http://www.laredoutecode.fr/sac-marque-portefeuille-c-19_20.html
http://e66.fr/vetement-homme-marque-manteaux-aaa-c-41_665.html
http://www.5fr.fr/vetement-homme-marque-pull-c-13_1181.html
http://www.9fr.fr/maillot-maillot-foot-pays-2013-c-4_1121.html
Sac
M44
Maillot
Casquette
Sac
http://www.b44.fr/vetement-femme-c-16.html
http://www.spartooo.fr/vetement-femme-c-6.html
http://e66.fr/vetement-femme-c-47.html
http://www.b44.fr/lunettes-c-22.html
http://www.m44.fr/sac-c-7.html
Posted by: tsvmwxbn | 05/02/2013 at 05:25 PM
Aw, this was a honestly nice post. In concept I would like to put in writing like this moreover - taking time and actual effort to make a rather very good article?- but what can I say?- I procrastinate alot and by no means appear to obtain some thing accomplished.
lululemon outlet
Posted by: preplyFeany | 05/15/2013 at 06:29 PM
This is the suitable blog for any individual who wants to find out about this topic. You recognize so much its almost tough to argue with you (not that I really would want?-HaHa). You unquestionably put a new spin on a subject thats been written about for years. Superb stuff, just wonderful!
cheap jordans shoes
Posted by: preplyFeany | 05/15/2013 at 07:07 PM