Receive this blog via Email


Voted 'best news blog' by readers of The Baltimore Sun in the 2010 Maryland's Outstanding Blog (or Mobbies) awards.


    The views and opinions expressed in the media, articles or comments on this site are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions held by CBF and the inclusion of such information does not imply endorsement by CBF. CBF is not responsible for the contents of any linked Web, or any link contained in a linked Web site, or any changes or updates to such Web sites. The inclusion of any link or comment is provided only for information purposes. CBF reserves the right to edit or remove any comments and material posted to this website and to ban users from the site without notice. Partisan, pornographic or other inappropriate content, product or service promotion, foul language or bad behavior is expressly forbidden and will be removed.

Mobile Auto-Detection: Bay Daily

Tracking Code - Bay Daily

« Norfolk Councilmembers Stand Against Coal Plant | Main | Smallmouth Bass Epidemic Highlights Need for Pollution Limits in Susquehanna River »



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Thank you for caring and covering the smart growth struggle that is going on in Charles County.
We are fortunate that we have Mattawoman, Zakiah and Nanjemoy Creeks and so much forest and wetland left to protect.

This battle with BGI, the development community with the call for "business as usual", is so harsh and extreme that it is encouraging more citizens to wake up to the reality that they have a choice. Do they want to keeping paying for unwanted, out of control growth and the needed infrastructure to support sprawl or do they want to support smarter growth? The potential for Charles County to move toward real walkable transit oriented communities in Waldorf is promising and will bring Charles onto the 21 C.
The Watershed Implication Plan or Bay Diet also makes it clear that "business as usual"
is not good for the environment or for the economy. Smart Growth presents a welcome choice.

Thanks for your news coverage Tom, we really appreciate it.

Yes, developers are angry and are fighting back.

However, Commissioner President Kelly appears to have the solid political support of angry parents -- they are angry that their children must attend overcrowded public schools because of the "business as usual/sprawl development" policies of some of our elected/government officials (Commissioners Reuben Collins, Debra Davis and Bobby Rucci would fall into this "developer love" camp).

There are many more angry parents than angry developers in Charles County, so the next election will likely bring more change.

Thanks for that political insight! Certainly, the people who are hurt by sprawl -- by its traffic congestion, overcrowded schools, ugly landscape and pollution -- far outnumber the few insiders who make money from these development deals.

It's all a question of who turns out to vote.

How can they vote to strip her power? What did she do? How are their actions not a crime? This is so over-the-top it's ridiculous!

Great article! Chuck great to see that you are still active!
Here we have a perfect example of the "growth machine", pouring money and energy into building infrastructure to boost future growth. From the book "Better Not Bigger" (published in 1999) Members of the "growth is good" groups tend to be wealthy, organized and politically influential. Real estate developers, mortgage bankers, realtors, construction companies, and contractors,pavers,cement, sand companies, and building suppliers.
This is based on the simplistic notion that growth will increase their business volume and they will become even more prosperous.
They conspire to increase profits at the expense of the neighborhoods, quiet beauty and environment of average families who live there!

The Board of Commissioners have actually most recently voted to restore some of her powers -- I continue to believe that these attacks on Kelly have backfired politically and have actually helped her gain more visibility and support in the county.

It's also provided an easier way for primary Democratic voters to sort out and identify which Commissioners are in the back-pocket of developers and which ones are on the side of the citizens.

And keep in mind, we're talking Charles County here ... we don't have a Washington Post or Baltimore Sun to shine a light on these kinds of stories ... social media is filling the void.

You can also listen online to a WYPR (88.1 FM in Baltimore) public radio program on this subject by going to the following web address and clicking on "play."

Kudos to Commissioner Candace Kelly in her fight to preserve wetlands and contain sprawl. Continue to fight the good fight. As a resident of St. Mary's County, next door, I see relentless pressure to approve more subdivisions and side with the developers. It makes no sense, and it is bad for the long therm health of the Bay and its tributaries. It is apparent that bold environmental leadership is fraught with political risk, so I hope that the citizens of Charles County are appreciative of the high cost of doing the right thing. We can learn a thing or two from Commissioner Kelly's example. Having been raised in Montgomery County, and seeing what a total debacle that has become, I hope that we can learn, and embrace smart growth. -Ted Turner, Hollywood, MD

I couldn’t help linking Mattawoman as one of Bay’s most fertile fish breeding grounds, with commissioner-president Candice Quinn Kelly’s quote about there being many scientific reasons to conserve land. A new report by a Task Force of state, federal, and academic agencies underscores the scientific case that “land conservation is fish conservation.” The report was specifically intended to help Charles County better protect Mattawoman as the county revises its Comprehensive Plan. (Download the large report here:

The Task Force “outlines the scientific basis for concluding” that business as usual “virtually assures continuing and dramatic watershed ecosystem deterioration” of Mattawoman Creek.

Because Mattawoman is passing the 10% threshold of impervious service, with a steeply declining estuarine fish community, the Task Force admonishes that “the current update of the Comprehensive Plan may well represent the last opportunity the County will have to establish permanent protection of the Mattawoman’s resources and ecological functions.”

The Task Force lists dozens of steps that the county could take to protect one of the Bay’s finest. But these are being pointedly ignored by a majority on the Charles County Planning Commission, who were appointed by the previous Board of Commissioners and are allies of the so-called Balanced Growth Initiative pro-development lobby. (The appointed Planning Commission is responsible for revising the comp plan, and is effectively independent of the elected Board of Commissioners, on which Candice Quinn Kelly serves as president.)

In the past, when science was mentioned, the commissioner presidents’ eyes would glaze over. It is refreshing to have Kelly as president, who is thoughtful, forward looking, and respects facts. But when facts show that sustainability requires a smarter-growth vision, the big money accustomed to paving the landscape uses their profits to fight progressive and needed changes.

Tom you are the best!! I remember the article you wrote about the Cross County Connector extension a few years ago that was enormously informative!!

I believe Commissioner Kelly and to a lesser degree, Commissioner Robinson are being vilified because they reject "business as usual". The developers had free rein in Charles County for decades and now that they've lost a lot of influence, power and control, they have decided to attack these two outstanding Commissioners.

All their money and influence will not work... and we see that now with angry parents whose children are being forced to relocate to other schools because of overcrowding.

This overcrowding has been caused by very poor "planning" in the past, much of that "planning" having been approved by PREVIOUS Planning Commission members and County Commissioners who were favorable to the developers.

Add in the approximately 28,000 new homes that may be built over the next few years, a dwindling water supply, more traffic, more school overcrowding, and more polluted waterways - the future looks bleak, HOWEVER there are three members of the Planning Commission and two County Commissioners (Kelly and Robinson) who CARE about the future of the county and will not be persuaded by the likes of BGI and others whose only objective is to increase their own personal "bottom line" regardless of the consequences and who gets hurt in the process.

Thanks, Cheryl! The good of the few who want to make quick cash by transforming the woods and wetlands of beautiful Southern Maryland into generic cul-de-sacs should not trump the good of the majority of voters who want adequate schools, uplifting scenery, plentiful drinking water, fishable streams, and functioning roads.

In my view, it's not "planning" at all to designate the entire northern part of Charles County as a growth area. That's the area, closest to the Washington DC metro area, that the developers themselves would circle with a magic marker and say "yep, give me all of that!" because that's where the suburban sprawl naturally wants to creep.

Planning would be to put some of these areas off limits to subdivisions, so that the county's attractiveness and quality of life and the natural water filters are preserved.

Always watch out when developers and bankers start talking about "Balance". This translates into "I want half of anything that I don't have already, to achieve balance." Of course, as the scenario plays out again and again, ad infinitum, soon enough there are hardly any trees or clean water left. Sprawl costs us all, except a few come away with all the profits. Thanks to Candice and Ken!

The water supply will soon be the arbiter of development "plans"...

Charles County Commissioner Candice Kelly is wonderfully progressive - trying to turn our county toward true Smart Growth, health, and prosperity for ALL citizens. As far as BGI's opposition, and their desperate attempt to hold Charles County back in the 1900's by continuing the killer sprawl that made them rich, only willfull ignorance or toxic greed could make people so stupidly unaware. Ignorance will NOT be bliss.

I served on a pnnaling commission for nine years when I lived in suburban Philadelphia. It is very difficult for municipalities to control development because the deck is stacked against them. Look at the state constitution, legislation and court decisions that govern what counties and townships are allowed to do. Developers and builders have pacs. The rest of us don't. Developers do not pay for the true cost of development. Schools, fire houses and equipment, police stations and equipment, etc. these costs are placed on the exsisting tax payers even though they don't profit from development. The quality of life issues aren't even part of the equation.Large property owners pay taxes and have a large monetary investment in the land. Farmers really only have their land for a retirement plan. If you want to control development, there are costs involved. First, follow the money. Look at pacs and campaign contributions. Next, who decides where and when sewer plants are expanded and built? It's sanitary sewer lines, not water lines, that allow huge housing growth. Then, it costs money for townships to keep their comprehensive plans and zoning ordinances up to date and defendable in court. It's very difficult to keep up with court decisions regarding development.Lastly, there needs to be an open space plan and some type of compensation to land owners to surrender their development rights. Some areas have done this. Look to the counties around Philadelphia. Most have some kind of open space plan that buys development rights from landowners to prevent building on the land. One caution, this can become a boondoggle too. The open space plan should be planned and not some willy nilly buy what ever some land owner wants to sell you. Contiguous properties along streams or some other reason for a green belt, preservations of natural resources including vistas are some reasons put forth. The Leewanau peninsula in Michigan (near Traverse City) wanted to preserve the historic fruit growing belt from housing development and put forth a plan.There are lots of resources through out the country to use. It will take a grassroots effort but can be done along with like minded local officials.

Jasmin Romero - I so Love all the of the Picture thank you Angie ..It was such an Amazing day and even more Amazing to have Married the Man of my Dreams I love you Honey Sharing this day with our family and frendis made it Wonderful ..We both thank you all for Being apart of our day We Love you guys. Thank you!October 2, 2011 8:28 pm

Mr. Hocker,Thank you for letting me know of your ineetrst in this proposal. There are some outstanding issues related to it that must be considered further. We do not want others to come in and vote down the proposal without our having the opportunity to make improvements to it first. Due to the timing of when it came in, the County Commissioners and the Charles County Delegation will need to work together to make it a more comprehensive plan for next year's legislative session. This is one drawback of having only 90 days in Annapolis to complete our business. Peter MurphyDelegate, District 28, Charles County

wow nice post

宿題など自分から進んで勉強しましょう。アナスイ 財布,テレビやゲームの時間を決めましょう。いい加減にして欲しいよ…。


ひろぱんもこの気持ちを覚えていてくれたら嬉しいんだけどなこれからもたくさんすれ違いとかあると思うけど、オークリー アウトレット,二人なりに、支え合いながら進もうね。

でお届けいたします午後時までに注文が確認(代金引換)、ご入金が確認(銀行振込)できた場合即日発送させて頂きます。プラダ バッグ,それ以降は、翌営業日の発送となります。(土日祝祭日は入金確認ができませんので翌営業日の発送となります。)


始業時間に教室に現れた彼は疲れ気味の様子だったが、ポリス サングラス,持ち前の気合いと根性で自身が平日朝にアメブロにアップしている“怒号”について熱く解説。

私たちの住む惑星クイック、置くのファッションを変更し始めています. ファッショナブルなあなたが本当にプログラマーのほとんどになりたい女の子している場合は、ファッショナブルなと、ワードローブのものを求めて、私選択行く有効にするのにはコーチの出口のコーチ バッグ推薦します. うちのコーチかどうかを計算しました. コーチを増やすか?さらにグッチ、YSL、ダナキャランだけでなく、すべての指摘バッグ技術担当のエンジニアが最も可能性の高いコーチ. コーチ 財布,規律は、1941 年に設立されました. そのハード中コーチ維持継続的に高い等級材料と技術標準.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment