Pennsylvania’s top fishing manager recently wrote an impassioned letter to the head of the state’s pollution control agency. The fish expert called for urgent state action to address wide-spread disease and death among smallmouth bass in the Susquehanna River, the largest tributary to the Chesapeake Bay.
“In the autumn of 2011…these outbreaks were so severe that approximately 40 percent of the adult smallmouth bass surveyed had extensive lesions and open sores,” John A. Arway, Executive Director of the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission, wrote on April 4th to Michael Krancer, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. Examples of lesions on young fish are shown in the picture above.
“We need to move beyond research and begin some action such as (creating pollution limits for the river) before the entire fishery of the river collapses and the time for action is too late,” Arway wrote.
His concerns are not speculative. Disease among smallmouth is already taking a toll on recreational anglers and the fishing guide and tackle industry. Yesterday, for the first time in more than a decade, Pennsylvania imposed a ban on fishing for smallmouth bass from May 1 to June 15 in much of the Susquehanna River. In a rare move, the state outlawed even the possession of the fish. The ban is intended to protect the troubled fish during spawning season, and help the species recover.
Arway has not been alone in his appeal for action on the Susquehanna River, which has experienced fish kills in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2010, and 2011.
Back in August 2011, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, PennFuture, American Rivers, and Trout Unlimited also wrote to the state environmental agency, urging that much of the river be officially designated as “impaired” under the federal Clean Water Act. Such a listing would force the creation of pollution limits for the river.
"Large-scale disease outbreaks have plagued young...smallmouth bass in the Susquehanna River," the environmental groups wrote. "The current hypothesis... contends stressful water quality conditions...are predisposing them to disease,” often from infections of columnaris bacteria, which are common in the water and sediment, the environmental groups wrote.
But so far, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection has declined to act. In a letter of response to Arway on April 16, Secretary Krancer admitted that the river is suffering from serious health problems. But Krancer said an impairment designation is not “factually or legally warranted,” according to the (Harrisburg) Patriot-News.
“We still don’t know what’s causing” the problems, a spokesman for the environmental agency told the newspaper.
But this hasn’t satisfied Arway. “When the anglers opinions line up with our scientific data, it’s pointing conclusively to me that we have an epidemic,” Arway said. “If the fish population were a human population, we’d have an epidemic.”
To prevent public health crises among humans, experts often deploy what is called the precautionary principal. Public health doctors don’t have to wait for absolute proof before acting to stop what the evidence shows is likely to cause harm.
The crisis in the Susquehanna River should inspire similar caution among Pennsylvania officials. They know, for example, that nutrient pollution (phosphorus and nitrogen) from fertilizers, sewage treatment plants, and stormwater runoff causes unhealthy conditions that are likely to stress a variety of life forms, including smallmouth bass.
The closing of much of the river to smallmouth fishing should be an urgent wake-up call that the government needs to take more aggressive action now to reduce this pollution.
By Tom Pelton
Chesapeake Bay Foundation
(Photo at top of young smallmouth bass with arrows pointing to lesions. Courtesy of Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission)

The problem that exists in the Susquehanna River is far more ominous than nutrient pollution. Smallmouth bass are intersexed, they are dying from opportunistic infections that suggest immune incompetence and now they are displaying abnormal collections of melanin (black pigment) which could represent cellular dysplasia (melanoma/cancer)or hormonal dysregulation of melanin deposition. These three problems suggest chemicals in the water that could present significant public health risks for people eating the fish and using the water for drinking and recreation. While nutrient pollution can indeed damage the environment, chemical endocrine disruptor pollution has greater potential consequences for public health.
The problems need immediate and aggressive evaluation and this impaired watershed needs to be cleaned up now.
William L. Yingling M.D.
Posted by: William L. Yingling M.D. | 05/02/2012 at 10:37 PM
You raise some excellent points, Dr. Yingling.
Endocrine disrupting chemicals are indeed a suspect in the intersex problems among the smallmouth bass in the Susquehanna and other rivers, although exactly which chemicals and what their sources are remain unclear.
The kinds of pollution limits being contemplated as part of a possible impairment listing and Clean Water Act Total Maximum Daily Load for the river typically do not include endocrine discruptors -- such as drugs or herbicides or soaps -- so perhaps an updating of the standards are needed.
Posted by: Tom Pelton | 05/03/2012 at 12:57 PM
Die Probleme müssen sofort und aggressiv Bewertung und dies beeinträchtigte Wasserscheide muss sich jetzt gereinigt werden.
Posted by: ralph lauren tee shirt | 05/24/2012 at 03:17 AM
It simply thus happens that lawyers are exceedingly smart at asking and answering queries.
Posted by: gas chromatography vials | 07/11/2012 at 09:29 AM
It is very important to take good care of the environment because it has its own way of getting back to us.
Posted by: engineering recruitment agencies | 07/11/2012 at 10:01 PM
You have heard the message by now: Melanoma is deadly. You also probably know that it is the fastest growing cancer in the United States and that one American every hour dies from melanoma. Millimeter for millimeter, it is the deadliest cancer. Rather than bore you with statistics on this horrid disease, allow me to share with you some fascinating background you may not have heard before.
Posted by: view this | 09/13/2012 at 02:21 AM
kmd iw mci sbb ar nsu kzv nk bne isabelmarantshoesale.com isabel marant shop online
bvh fnd xw bhn fjk qi ykg qhs isabel marant sneaker
isabel marant sko
atl lai qi gdb lbe hp qtw nim
http://www.isabelmarantshoesale.com/#9923 zgy nfw
Posted by: isabelmarant079 | 09/27/2012 at 03:22 AM
Hi Tom Pelton. I need your permission to publish the above article in a book I am writing. I would appreciate it. My email is perconsignment@hotmai.com. You may see the book if you like. Thanks.
Paul Thomas
1. Publication-Bay Daily
2. Writer/Photographer-Not applicable
3. Date of publication- May 02, 2012
4. Headline/Caption- Not applicable
5. Name of publisher-Chesapeake Bay Foundation
6. Title- Smallmouth Bass Epidemic Highlights Need for Pollution Limits in Susquehanna River
7. Author- Tom Pelton
8. Print run-1,000
9. Date book will publish-2014
Posted by: Paul Thomas | 10/05/2012 at 12:30 AM
A British-Australian research team has just found coral trout living on the south side of the Great Barrier Reef sporting dark skin lesions. Fifteen percent of the affected populations at two sites bore brown-black growths, some of them raised and almost scablike.
Posted by: thesis writing | 10/05/2012 at 07:51 AM
Whatever afflicts the Australian fish, the problem didn’t emerge until 2010. That’s when a reef biologist studying sharks happened to notice dark patches on neighboring coral trout. The observation prompted the researchers to deliberately hook 136 of these fish between August 2010 and February 2012.
Posted by: buy research paper college | 10/05/2012 at 07:53 AM
As pathologists when we say melanoma, there are certain things we need to see — like local invasiveness,” explains Wolfgang Vogelbein of the Virginia Institute of Marine Science in Gloucester Point. He's referring to where cells begin migrating from the initial tumor toward blood vessels, from which they can serve as seeds for new cancers throughout the body.
Posted by: buy research paper | 10/05/2012 at 07:54 AM
These lesions could reflect some hormonal abnormality or pre-cancerous transformation triggered by water contaminants, she says. Those blotches might even be the equivalent of sun burn from ultraviolet radiation penetrating unusually deeply into the water. “We just don’t know,” she says. “It’s something we need to investigate more.”
Posted by: buy research paper online | 10/05/2012 at 07:56 AM