Arlington: More Green, Less Stormwater
DC Program Pays Residents to Reduce Stormwater Pollution

Superstorm Sandy Not as Harmful to Chesapeake Bay as Past Storms

HurricaneSandy-NASA-lgSuperstorm Sandy devastated New York City and New Jersey and left millions of people without power. But the storm will likely cause less harm to the Chesapeake Bay than past major storms, like Hurricane Agnes in 1972, or last year’s Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee, whose rains flushed vast quantities of mud, debris, and other pollutants into the Chesapeake Bay, according to Dr. Beth McGee, Senior Scientist with the Chesapeake Bay Foundation.

Sandy dumped less rain than these previous storms upstream from the Bay in Pennsylvania, in the watershed of the Susquehanna River, the Chesapeake's largest tributary. At the Conowingo Dam on the Susquehanna River this week, water levels hit 19 feet. That was  significantly lower than flood stage, which is 23 feet, and also lower than the 32 feet the waters hit during Hurricane Irene last year, according to U.S. Geological Survey.

“There was a lot less runoff this year,” said Dr. McGee. “We don’t expect to see much of an effect on the Chesapeake Bay proper. But we might see a lot of erosion on the smaller streams and low lands on the Eastern Shore.”

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Chesapeake Bay Office reported that because the winds were primarily from the north, the storm did not blow a big surge of water up the Bay that would have severely flooded cities and towns in Maryland and Virginia (as might have happened if the winds had the winds been blowing from the south).  "While parts of New Jersey, New York, and the southern New England coast dealt with crippling storm surge, for the most part, the Chesapeake Bay avoided surge-related flooding, though some coastal flooding was reported," NOAA reported. "

There was, however, a huge push of water into Manhattan, where millions remain without power or mass transit. Eyeing this devastation, Mike Tidwell, founder of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, published an article in The Nation that proclaimed: "We are all from New Orleans now. Climate change—through the measurable rise of sea levels and a documented increase in the intensity of Atlantic storms—has made 100 million Americans virtually as vulnerable to catastrophe as the victims of Hurricane Katrina were seven years ago."

Back in the Chesapeake region, some scientists feared that the water pollution resulting from the “double whammy” of Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee in August and September of 2011 would worsen the Bay’s low oxygen "Dead Zone" during the summer of 2012. But that did not happen, according to Dr. McGee.  Water clarity in the Bay suffered in the short term because of all the silt and mud. But the nitrogen and phosphorus pollution from stormwater runoff did not cause a long-term impact on the Chesapeake.

In fact, the dead zones in the Bay this past summer were at their second lowest level since monitoring began in 1985 (second only to that first year), according to the Maryland Department of Natural Resources. About 16.7 percent of the water in the Bay this past summer had low-oxygen conditions (less than 2 parts per million dissolved oxygen in the water, which can be deadly to fish) compared to more than 25 percent of the Bay during June through August of 2011.

This could be a sign that reduced pollution into the Bay over many years is helping the estuary’s ability to bounce back from storms. “We are hopeful we will see an improved resilience with this ecosystem, so that when these events occur…the Bay can recover more quickly,” Dr. Donald Boesch, President of the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, told WYPR public radio.

Underwater grasses -– which were buried in mud by the massive Hurricane Agnes in June 1972 -– will probably not be wiped out by Superstorm Sandy, Dr. McGee said. The plants normal lifecycle means that they have already disappeared for the season by late October.

Beyond silt and runoff pollution, storms often also trigger power failures and overflows at municipal sewage treatment systems.

On Monday, Superstorm Sandy knocked out Howard County’s sewage treatment facility in Savage, Maryland, causing a spill of about 20 million gallons of sewage and rainwater to gush into the Little Patuxent River, a Chesapeake Bay tributary. This was the largest of about 19 sewage spills reported across Maryland during the storm, according to The Baltimore Sun.

But even all these are minor in comparison to the spills during Hurricane Irene last year, which included more than 100 million gallons of sewage released during the rupture of a sewer main into the lower Patapsco River, the newspaper reported.

For details on how much rain and snow fell during Superstorm Sandy, click here.

By Tom Pelton

Chesapeake Bay Foundation

(Photo from NASA)








Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

"That improved resilience comes from the Bay region states implementing plans to meet EPA pollution limits for the Chesapeake that are like blueprints for saving the Bay. Important actions include the installation of stormwater management systems that allow rain water to sink into the ground rather than run off."

Blueprints are plans......meaning it is in the planning satage and yet to be implemented or how could it reduce pollution?

I await your answer and ask that put some forethought into these articles.

Will the day ever come that wastewater treatment plant never have major overflows?
Or will they continue to be so common that they are of little concern as you have made them to be in this article.
It is funny how septic systems are given such a bad label to the demise of the bay but the constant oveflows of public sewers is just another day.

Until the stormwater/wastewater issue is addressed the bay will never recover.
Note: Septic systems are generally not effected by stormwater and the words septic system and millions of gallons of overflow will never be used in the same sentence.

Thanks for the feedback, Mark.

For the rest of the readers, here is the text in the blog article that Mark was questioning. It appeared after the Don Boesch quote:

"That improved resilience comes from the Bay region states implementing plans to meet EPA pollution limits for the Chesapeake that are like blueprints for saving the Bay. Important actions include the installation of stormwater management systems that allow rain water to sink into the ground rather than run off."

I have since removed this section, because it might have confused readers with its discussion of past improvements and future plans.

Here is an explanation of what I meant:

Over more than a decade, the Bay regional states have been implementing plans to reduce pollution into the Chesapeake, in part by upgrading sewage treatment plants. I called the most recent of these plans "blueprints," but the basis for these blueprints were water quality improvement strategies for Bay tributaries that were created by the states years ago and partially implemented.

Driven in part by these plans, improvements in sewage treatment plants (as well as better practices to reduce runoff of pollution from farms), have meant a gradual improvement in water quality in the Bay. This, in turn, helps the Bay's resilience and ability to bounce back after major storms.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)