Virginia is well on the way to approving critically needed funding for Chesapeake Bay restoration.
Late last week, Gov. Bob McDonnell released his proposed amendments to Virginia’s new two-year budget adopted earlier by the Virginia General Assembly. This was the next step in approving a budget that includes $87.6 million to help Virginia localities pay for upgrades to their sewage treatment plants, among the larger sources of pollution plaguing the Bay.
While the Assembly will have the last word on the governor’s amendments, it’s likely the Bay funding will remain intact. That’s very important for the Bay, local rivers, and local governments.
There may not be a lot of homes or businesses being built in the current real estate market, but there are major attempts to open farmland for developers when they’re ready.
In Maryland at least, a new but untested state law might be the best defense against land speculators’ further incursion into the countryside.
A group of environmental groups and property owners filed a lawsuit Thursday, Dec. 8, against the county commissioners of Queen Anne’s County, Maryland, to stop the latest attempt by some local governments to pave over our rural landscape.
The next few days may determine the future of Cambridge, Maryland.
The Cambridge City Council will decide, perhaps as early as Monday, whether to chart a new course for the Eastern Shore town's economic development away from strip malls, chain restaurants, and sprawl, and toward a healthy downtown.
The city’s planning commission has offered a new blueprint for the city, a Comprehensive Plan that proposes to revitalize Cambridge from the inside. The plan envisions micro-financing loans to encourage downtown entrepreneurs, as well as training and mentoring; development along the downtown waterfront; improved streets and intersections for bikers and walkers; and a "green belt" around the city beyond which no development will be allowed, as well as other measures.
How about this for a fish-eye's view of the state of the Chesapeake Bay? This is a shot of underwater grasses thriving near Havre de Grace, Maryland, as seen by a lensman (Octavio Aburto) looking up at an angler in a boat. I'm not sure the vision of a fisherman overhead would make the fish feel secure. But in our view, this view is encouraging, because underwater grasses have been expanding in the Bay the last few years, which is both a sign and a source of improving water quality.
This picture was taken as part of a photography campaign to build public support for new federal clean water legislation, called the Chesapeake Bay Clean Water Act, whose fate Congress may decide in the next 10 days.
Written by Patrick Miller, CBF Director of Community Building and Web Services
Early yesterday morning the CBF carpool headed to D.C. so that we could watch as the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee considered the Chesapeake Clean Water Act and answer any questions reporters might have.
We had heard the vote was going to be tight and in this political environment a contentious bill limping out of the committee is likely going to quietly die. Leadership has asked its members to take many tough votes recently: health care, financial reform, TARP, etc and wants to minimize subjecting them to additional contentious votes.
Progress toward a cleaner Chesapeake Bay can’t always be measured in nutrient loads alone. In Cambridge, MD positive change seems to have occurred at a certain boiling point of citizen upset.
Cambridge is a small Eastern Shore city on the banks of the Choptank River that gained notoriety only a few years ago for approving a massive resort development near the fragile Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge. Now the city is becoming a beacon of green civic consciousness.
"It’s almost like a 180-degree change," says Bill Giese, a community activist.
PLEASE READ OUR TERMS OF USE The views and opinions expressed in the media, articles or comments on this site are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions held by CBF and the inclusion of such information does not imply endorsement by CBF. CBF is not responsible for the contents of any linked Web, or any link contained in a linked Web site, or any changes or updates to such Web sites. The inclusion of any link or comment is provided only for information purposes. CBF reserves the right to edit or remove any comments and material posted to this website and to ban users from the site without notice. Partisan, pornographic or other inappropriate content, product or service promotion, foul language or bad behavior is expressly forbidden and will be removed.