RSS

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

DISCLAIMER

  • PLEASE READ OUR TERMS OF USE
    The views and opinions expressed in the media, articles or comments on this site are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions held by CBF and the inclusion of such information does not imply endorsement by CBF. CBF is not responsible for the contents of any linked Web, or any link contained in a linked Web site, or any changes or updates to such Web sites. The inclusion of any link or comment is provided only for information purposes. CBF reserves the right to edit or remove any comments and material posted to this website and to ban users from the site without notice. Partisan, pornographic or other inappropriate content, product or service promotion, foul language or bad behavior is expressly forbidden and will be removed.

Local Communities

« Calling Hampton Roads Shoppers | Main | What Are You Doing for Earth Day? »

February 06, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfb5353ef01053714f67d970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Science or Politics?:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

johndoe

Science has worked about as well as politics.

George Meredith MD

Restoring the Chesapeake Bay watershed

An estuary must be nourished over the course of its lifetime. Sand, silt, phytoplankton, ocean water phosphorus, marine vertebrates and invertebrates are all essential for the health this estuary. An estuary is a dynamic creature. Not a fortress. An estuary is not to be (shoreline) dredged, bulk headed, shoreline hardened, used as a sanitary sewer over flow drain, cut off, straightened, filled in, used as a storm water conduit, polluted or used as a dump site. These things all adversely affect the clean seawater and sediment necessary to nourish a marine estuary such as the Lynnhaven basin. Nourishment that is normally provided by twice daily tidal cycles.
Expensive, unproven reconstruction of the Chesapeake Bay oyster reefs, while an admirable goal will not, can not restore this precious estuary. Because the underlying errors in man’s alteration in the hydrology and sediment migration of the Lynnhaven basin be unchanged.
Fortunately, negative alterations of marine estuaries can be counter balanced by using inexpensive, relatively new technologies. Pre cast concrete box culverts, can be installed under obstructing roadways and rail lines to reestablish tidal flows. The Rolligon Amphibious 4x4 Rotary Ditcher Spreader can economically and expediously recreate tidal creeks.
The hydraulic rotary cutting head pipeline dredge can clear navigation channels while simultaneously rebuilding fringe marshes. All of these techniques represent economical, cost effective methods of estuary reconstruction. As have been/are being, done in South San Francisco Bay, Galveston Bay, much of coastal Louisiana, in Blackwater NWR, Little River Salt Marsh and elsewhere.
The demise of the Chesapeake Bay watershed and its wonderful oysters, finfish, blue crabs, shorebirds, raptors, waterfowl and furbearers are the direct result of the transgressions listed above. And the chances of some Army Corps of Engineers oyster shell/oyster spat dumping program, costing 500 million dollars, of correcting these deficiencies is: zero.
Wake up! Meaningful estuary reconstruction research has already been done. And its got nothing to do with squandering a half a billion borrowed dollars on more non-productive oyster reefs! It’s not necessary to reinvent the wheel!
George Meredith MD

ED Medication

hello people want to express my satisfaction with this blog very creative and I really like the views of the focus very good indeed
buscar

buy kamagra

Do you know a magazine writing about current events, politics, science and other interesting topics?
Im looking for a magazine to subscribe to, weekly or monthly. I already have the economist, very satisfied.

jra5678

State and federal governments have spent millions of dollars since 1994 trying to rebuild reefs, but they still continue to disappear. Haven't we spent enough our time and enough of the taxpayers money on something that is clearly not working. Isn't it time we start trying something new? In order to restore the oyster population and improve the health of the Chesapeake Bay, I believe that it is time to launch a broad effort to introduce the Asian Crassostrea ariakensis into the bay. The combination of sterilization, predation, and harvest should control the introduced population.

Chesapeake Bay Foundation

jra5678 -

Actually, native oyster restoration efforts are working. Reef ball projects in both Maryland and Virginia are having great success. Maryland just increased its number of sanctuary reefs. Oyster aquaculture is proving very successful. CBF released a report earlier this year showing that our native oysters are continuing to build up a resistance to diseases. http://www.cbf.org/Page.aspx?pid=1942

As for the Asian oyster, research has shown they pose their own risks. They are more vulnerable to predators and have a greater sensitivity to the Bay's low dissolved oxygen levels. You can find out more about the risks of introducing the Asian oyster in this article from 2009. http://www.cbf.org/Page.aspx?pid=1282

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment