This is the fourth in a series of blogs on how community conservation groups worked with farmers in Bradford County, Pennsylvania, and Rockingham County, Virginia, to improve the water quality of local streams and rivers through various Best Management Practices. Read the third, second, and first parts.
CBF tree plantings on Darrel Landes farm along Muddy Creek. Photo by CBF Staff.
Both the trust developed by the outreach process and the technical assistance offered by the state and federal partners played key roles in participation by the Old Order Mennonites in the Muddy Creek and Dry River watersheds. Even though the pollution limits applied just as much to them as to their less conservative neighbors, many chose to invest their own money instead of government cost-share funds to upgrade their conservation practices and develop nutrient management plans for both crop fields and livestock operations. They have, however, accepted the technical assistance offered by NRCS, the Shenandoah Valley SWCD, and CBF. It is testimony to the Mennonites’ faith, their stewardship ethic, and the encouragement of their bishops that these farmers paid the full cost to install the recommended conservation practices, which included about 80 percent of the streambank livestock exclusion fencing installed to date.
It is worth noting, however, that the other farmers along Muddy Creek who have accepted cost-share funding have also willingly contributed their shares of their projects’ costs. One particularly important portion of the cost-share funds made available to them has come through NRCS from special Chesapeake Bay program sections of the 2008 Farm Bill.
Muddy Creek’s condition improved significantly from 2001-2006, thanks to the whole-farm combinations of Best Management Practices installed then. They included dairy loafing lot systems, 10 miles of stream fencing to exclude livestock, grazing systems to protect and enhance pastures, 1,200 acres of cover crops for small grains, and side-dress application of nitrogen on corn. In addition, the project addressed rural human wastewater issues with 13 septic system repairs and replacements, 30 septic tank pump-outs, and the installation of five alternative waste treatment systems. Improvement has continued since 2006, as farmers along the creek have worked steadily to extend, enhance, and maintain these conservation practices, both with and without cost-share funding.
Their efforts have produced one major success: Muddy Creek and lower Dry River are no longer impaired for excessive nitrate. Levels of that pollutant have consistently stayed around 6 mg/l in Muddy Creek and 4 mg/l in Dry River, with no sample in excess of the drinking water standard (10 mg/l) since 2004, despite some years of heavy runoff that would previously have produced continuous violations.
Muddy Creek is still impaired for E. coli bacteria and benthic invertebrates. Though the results of in-the-field water quality testing indicate clear improvements, they also suggest caution, as E. coli violation rates continue to run over 50-60 percent in the creek's watershed, still a long way from the maximum 10.5 percent violation rate necessary to de-list the water and call it fully supporting for recreational use. The job has taken a decade so far. The great cooperation over that time between many partners—both public and private—deserves high praise, but it is important to understand and be realistic about the effort and the resources necessary to turn around waterway ecosystems that have been (largely unintentionally) treated very roughly for over a century.
—John Page Williams
Stay tuned for the fifth and final part of the "Cows and Clean Water Series" next week!

I posted this question to the facebook but thought I might have better luck here:
I was just wondering if you do any work advocating for native warm season grasses in the Bay area. Research by the Ag Research Station in Oxford, Mississippi, found that a 3 foot wide buffer of native warm season grasses offers the same filtration as a 20 foot wide buffer of fescue. It also improves habitat for wildlife and insects, and as an incentive to cattlemen or dairy producers, increases the productivity of pastures during fescue's summer slump. I think it could be a real asset in cleaning up the Bay.
Thanks!
Posted by: Shayan | October 16, 2012 at 12:13 PM
Thanks very much for your comment! I will ask around and talk with our restoration team about your thoughts and get back to you! Thanks, Emmy
Posted by: Emmy Nicklin | October 17, 2012 at 04:41 PM
You all know how much irritable the weeds are. Are you aware of the weed???
Posted by: TP Knotweed | October 20, 2012 at 06:25 AM
Ola! Vostede sabe se eles fan calquera plugins para protexer contra hackers? Eu estou medio paranoico sobre a perda de todo o que eu teño a traballar duro. Algunha recomendación? Ola, eu atope seu blog dende Google, mentres busca un tema relacionado, o sitio web xurdiu, iso parece gran. Eu teño bookmarked-lo nos meus favoritos.
Posted by: canada goose paris | October 24, 2012 at 05:36 AM
Creo que su perspectiva es profundo, es sólo bien pensado y realmente fantástico ver a alguien que sabe cómo poner estos pensamientos tan bien. Gran trabajo en este
su blog es muy good.It estaba muy bien escrito y fácil de entender. A diferencia de otros blogs que he leído que no son muy buenos.
Posted by: chaussures mercurial vapor | November 19, 2012 at 03:15 AM
Both the trust developed by the outreach process and the technical assistance offered by the state and federal partners played key roles in participation by the Old Order Mennonites in the Muddy Creek and Dry River watershed
Posted by: Curtain Cleaners London | December 14, 2012 at 07:25 AM
Either the reliance designed by the outreach treatment while the dedicated suggestions offered by the state and additionally open you played most roles in encounter by the Excellent Demand Mennonites in the Muddy Creek and Dry River watershed
Curtain Cleaners London
Posted by: moscow gordeeva | December 18, 2012 at 01:29 AM