DISCLAIMER

  • PLEASE READ OUR TERMS OF USE
    The views and opinions expressed in the media, articles or comments on this site are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions held by CBF and the inclusion of such information does not imply endorsement by CBF. CBF is not responsible for the contents of any linked Web, or any link contained in a linked Web site, or any changes or updates to such Web sites. The inclusion of any link or comment is provided only for information purposes. CBF reserves the right to edit or remove any comments and material posted to this website and to ban users from the site without notice. Partisan, pornographic or other inappropriate content, product or service promotion, foul language or bad behavior is expressly forbidden and will be removed.

Mobile Auto-Detection: CBF

Tracking Code - CBF Blog

« Photo of the Week: The American Lotus at Mattawoman Creek | Main | Photo of the Week: Dog Days of Summer »

August 14, 2014

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfb5353ef01a73e01cbf5970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Polluted Runoff: Be the Solution:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

RKolberg

Good piece. But why no mention of the 3+ MILLION gallons of raw sewage spilled into the Patapsco from Baltimore City's sewage treatment (hah!) system, and the very belated health warning from city officials?

The volume of the Baltimore spill is an order of magnitude greater--and the warning significantly later--than the spills featured here. Maybe an update is in order? Or perhaps CBF, like the City of Baltimore, MD Dept of Environment, and EPA, prefers to look the other way as these ongoing "accidental" spills turn the Patapsco River--and ultimately the Chespaeake Bay--into little more than an open sewer?

Chesapeake Bay Foundation

Thanks for reaching out. We are just as concerned about sewage spills in Baltimore City, Baltimore County, and other areas of the state when they occur as we are with Anne Arundel County spills.

We had not learned of the Baltimore spills at the time of posting the above blog. That said, Baltimore City has made significant strides fixing its ancient sewer system and fixing at least 60 areas known to leak during storms. In fact, thanks to the Bay Restoration Fund, both the Patapsco and Back River wastewater treatment plants are in the process of being upgraded to the state-of-the-art standard and should be completed by August of 2015. There is still much work underway, including major improvements to the city’s large sewage plants. We trust the city will continue this good work, but we remain concerned.

Data on these spills is not always reliable. And as we saw last week, major storms still seem to send large amounts of untreated or partially treated sewage into city waters. The Inner Harbor and other city waters can’t be cleaned if the city doesn't comply with a federally-mandated reduction of sewer spills.

And since you rightfully put the Anne Arundel spills into perspective, let’s remember, too, that harmful as sewer spills can be to local waters, especially short term, they pale in comparison to other pollution sources. Believe it or not, the Chesapeake and its tributaries still receive far more harmful pollution from permitted sewer system effluent, farms, and other sources.

For more information, please visit our website: http://www.cbf.org/about-the-bay/issues/sewage-septic-systems

RKolberg

What planet do you live on?

"Significant strides" + "Good work" = 12 million gallons of sewage spilled into the Patapsco River

Sure would hate to see what CBF considers doing way too little, way too slowly. Perhaps we need to be able to WALK across the Patapsco on solid sludge before CBF gets alarmed about conditions in our urban watershed, which--believe it or not--actually does feed into the Chesapeake Bay.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment