Leaders Are Behind the Curve on Bay Cleanup
Chesapeake History Game: Where Capt. John Smith Didn't Go

Pennsylvania Water Tests Show Low Levels of Radioactivity

Drillingtrucks The Pennsylania Department of Environmental Protection today announced that it had tested water in seven rivers downstream of treatment plants that accept hydraulic fracturing wastewater from gas drilling and found "all samples showed levels at or below the normal naturally occurring background levels of radioactivity." For more, click here.

The state agency's announcement came days after The New York Times published a series of investigative articles headlined "Drilling Down," that discussed the potential radioacivity of hydraulic fracturing wastewater.

In response to those articles, former Pennsylvania Governor Edward Rendell and former state Department of Environmental Protection Secretary John Hanger published a letter in the Times suggesting that all public water systems should be tested for radioactivity, no matter how remote the threat.

"Pennsylvania should order all its public water systems to immediately test for radioactive pollutants," Rendell and Hanger wrote. "Only testing of our drinking water can resolve this question and give citizens peace of mind."

Meanwhile, Clean Water Action and other groups are planning a hydraulic fracturing protest rally in Harrisburg, Pa., at 1:30 p.m. Wednesday outside the Capitol Forum at the S.E. corner of the Capitol Complex on Walnut Street between Commonwealth Avenue and 7th Street. “Gas drilling companies like Exxon Mobil are making billions of dollars in profit, but not paying their fair share" in taxes, Clean Water Action said in a written statement.



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

It seems fishy (no pun intended!) to me that these results seemed to magically appear, as soon as their release would be "beneficial" (after the damning Times articles). If these tests were done months ago, what took so long to make them public? Also, there needs to be some background information included in these results, such as water levels during testing. If streams were running high, then dilution levels could have been high.

Something stinks here and it is NOT the dead fish in our river.

Good questions, Convenient. Sometimes things aren't what they appear.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)