County That Refused Pollution Control Fee Now Suffering from Pollution
Deformities in Yellow Perch Eggs Linked to Suburban Sprawl

Pictures Show Chesapeake Bay Waterfront Threatened by New Jersey Developer

Four seasons development siteWhat do you see in this picture? The blue waters of the mouth of the Chester River, as it flows into the Chesapeake Bay. A scenic shoreline on Kent Island, with a  tree casting a shadow beside a farm field. Clouds drifting peacefully overhead.
Here's what you don’t see:  1,079 houses and condominiums that New Jersey-based developer Hovnanian Enterprises is proposing to build right here, blacktopping much of this waterfront scenery.

This photo –- and the massive Four Seasons housing project planned here, north of Route 50 in Stevensville, Maryland --  is an illustration of weaknesses in Maryland’s environmental and land-use laws.  The development may be one of the largest ever built within 1,000 feet of the Chesapeake Bay since the 1984 passage of Maryland’s landmark Critical Areas law, which is supposed to protect waterfront areas.

Four seasons planEconomic development is great, but it should be well planned.  And there is no need for a massive construction project like this in fields right on the banks of the Chesapeake Bay.  Kent Island is already overwhelmed with residential development and traffic problems, and the waterfront land here is vulnerable to flooding and sea level rise.
On July 24, the Maryland Board of Public Works (made up of Governor Martin O’Malley; Comptroller Peter Franchot; and Treasurer Nancy Kopp) decided not to act on the developer’s request for a state license to destroy wetlands on the 425-acre development site. (The plans for the site are shown above.)
Jay Falstad, Executive Director of the Queen Anne’s Conservation Association (below), shook his head in disgust as he looked out on the fields threatened by the project on a recent morning.   “It is our view that putting in this type of development -– to this size and scale -– on the waters of the Chester and the Chesapeake makes no sense,” Falstad said.
“Hopefully, the legislature -– and certainly the governor, the comptroller and the treasurer -– will find a way…to deny the wetlands license and prevent this monstrosity from occurring.”
Jay Falstad at Four Seasons siteThe state board’s decision last week sent the project back down to the Queen Anne’s County government, which approved  a controversial development agreement for the project more than a decade ago.  The county must now consider a land preservation easement for part of the land that the builders say they will protect as a park. And the local government may also consider amending the development agreement to add additional environmental protections. 
Some conservationists believe the county should now go back to the drawing board and reconsider -– and hold more public hearings and votes on –- the whole project. The developers maintain such a new round of local approvals and hearings will not be necessary.
Four seasons site 3The best resolution now could be to have the state and perhaps partners step in and buy the land, turning it into a public park or wildlife preserve.

The immediate picture is the snapshot at the top of this story: Beautiful waterfront property threatened with yet more ugly suburban sprawl.
But the bigger question is about control over development decisions.  Yes, local governments deserve some control over land use within their boundaries. But huge projects such as the Four Seasons can cause harm far beyond municipal boundaries –- including to traffic on state and federal roads, and runoff pollution that flows downstream to contaminate the Chesapeake Bay and other bodies of water. 
Four seaons site 4These issues transcend local political boundaries. And so control over projects like this should include more authority for state governments that can step back and take a more global view.  The question should be:  What’s in the best interests of everybody, not just the best interest of a few developers and local supporters interested in short-term cash.
We all have a stake in a healthy Chesapeake Bay. And so we should all raise our voices to oppose poorly-conceived projects like the Four Seasons.

So at 7 pm on September 17th when the Queen Anne's County Commissioners meet to discuss the issue at the Kent Island High School, we need to be there -– with our signs and posters, our passion and our voices.  Let’s tell the county commission this is a culmination of bad decisions.  We don’t want this development.

By Tom Pelton

Chesapeake Bay Foundation

Four Seasons site 1


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Please let us know what we can do? Write letters to which politicians? Anyone willing to start a petition? I can't take the lead, but would be glad to help and activists can see how we're fighting a particular development that affects the downstream watershed at for ideas.

Thanks for referring people to your website, Connie. Check it out, folks:

It's a good example of speaking out and organizing at the local level to get the attention of elected officials. That's what America's all about. In the end, elected officials answer to us voters, not to developers.

In response to your questions, Connie:

At 7 pm on September 17th, CBF is urging everyone who cares about the issue to attend the Queen Anne's County Commissioners meeting at Kent Island High School. Bring signs, posters, and strong voices.

Let's tell the county commissioners we do not want this development, which will just add to pollution in the Bay and traffic jams on Kent Island.

I sincerely think the 4 Seasons project on the mouth of the Chester River & the Chesapeake Bay is a very bad, idea. How can someone convince me that the serenity of that beautiful scenery will not be spoiled forever, and that storm-related pollution run-off won't end up in the Chesapeake Bay? What about the issue of traffic jams on Kent Island by the way, since traffic jam amounts to increase emissions & air pollution that hurt people living with asthma & other respiratory illnesses? Creating jobs, providing housing for Maryland citizens, and generating income for Kent Island & the State of Maryland is a laudable idea, but that shouldn't be at the expense of polluting our water bodies and putting the health of the public at risk. l strongly condemn the move as an environmentalist. Betty Awuah, Baltimore

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)